Is rising inequality due to an increase in winner-take-all markets? http://t.co/CFutEDvaZp — Noah Smith (@Noahpinion) May 29, 2015 Although I’m more partial to the Republican perspective on this issue, Wealth inequality and poverty is something that both sides get wrong to varying degrees, with the left tending to be more wrong the the right. The… Continue reading Good Tweets, Part 2
The Left’s Problem With Science
In an article for Taki Magazine, Jim Goad knocks it out of the park, especially with this paragraph: They want to eat their Darwin Fish—or, rather, they want to dispose of it and hide all evidence that it ever existed—when faced with the sheer preposterousness of what they’re proposing, which is that human evolution magically… Continue reading The Left’s Problem With Science
Defending Rational Markets
Liberals like to assume markets and individuals are irrational, in agreement with their denial of individual cognitive exceptionalism. After all, if everyone is an irrational blank slate, how can anyone be intrinsically better than anyone else? It’s then not surprising to see Michael Lewis – the inveterate liberal anti-banker journalist – be in favor of… Continue reading Defending Rational Markets
The Tyranny of the Bookish
Saw this re-tweeted by the great Charles Murray: Controlling for confounds, kids' test scores are unrelated to time in school, studying, TV. But reading = big deal http://t.co/cHHqYVUAXr — SteveStewartWilliams (@SteveStuWill) May 13, 2015 Perhaps it’s reading books, not grades, parenting, or TV, that is the biggest influence of success at life. It seems in… Continue reading The Tyranny of the Bookish
The Great Decoupling
From AV: The Great Decoupling Ultimately, I think this whole debate on wages, STEM, wealth inequality, and automation boils down to IQ. The decoupling is also obvious when comparing advanced degree employment and income versus those with only high school or ‘some college’. It’s also pronounced between majors, with STEM earning more. these trends have… Continue reading The Great Decoupling
Marc Andreessen and Twitter
Marc Andreessen, who is perhaps the most important VC and forecaster right now, like more soft-spoken Peter Thiel, is correct about many things such as Web 2.0 not being a bubble and being skeptical of democracy. The later point agrees with the NRX (Neo Reaction) ideology, showing that one need not be directly affiliated with… Continue reading Marc Andreessen and Twitter
Bernanke is Right
He’s right: Bernanke sees no risk of hard landing in China, bullish on U.S. economy Not only does Bernanke deserve a standing ovation for saving the day in 2008 (along with Paulson and Bush), he’s right about the US economy still being fundamentally sound and about China not having a crash landing, as much as… Continue reading Bernanke is Right
Telling Fairy Tales To Spare Our Feelings
From Quora How can I be as great as Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Elon Musk, and Richard Branson? Why can’t we have an honest debate about success and the role of IQ? Why do we need to lie to ourselves and then spread these lies to innocent victims, filling their heads with nonsense? Rhetorical question,… Continue reading Telling Fairy Tales To Spare Our Feelings
The Canonization of Dr. Nash
Yesterday, the Nobel Prize winning mathematician and economist John Nash Jr. and his wife died in a taxi accident. From the NY Times obituary: Receiving his bachelor’s and master’s degrees at Carnegie, he arrived at Princeton in 1948, a time of great expectations, when American children still dreamed of growing up to be physicists like… Continue reading The Canonization of Dr. Nash
Defending the EMH
Continuing on my first post about the efficient market hypothesis (EMH), I believe in a semi-strong version of the hypothesis, which allows for some opportunities to make profit through a process called fundamental drift. It would seem that the EMH’s biggest opponent are from the ‘right’ of the political spectrum (zerOh3dge and Market Ticker type… Continue reading Defending the EMH