I saw this going viral on Twitter:
You'll never get rich working for someone else š
— āærianā“āµā° š (@bjmcgann) August 18, 2024
Yeah, someone should have told Tom Cruise this. Or Michael Jordan, Shaq, or anyone who works for a top quant firm. Bonuses and other comp for large trading firms can easily run into the 7-figures. Some even make 8-figures. But what would they know? They are obviously missing out by not being self-employed.
Also, small business has major survivorship bias. The mean is skewed by outliers, but the median is far worse due to many failures. It’s like saying you can get rich with the lottery, which is technically true, but also highly improbable. A major reason why so many athletes go broke is by starting businesses or investing in franchises, instead of putting that money somewhere better like index funds. A notable example is Curt Schilling, who blew a $75 million fortune on a failed computer game company.
I have seen others like James Altucher and Nassim Taleb echo a similar sentiment–that the only way to get ‘truly rich’ (however that is defined, which it never is) is with self-employment. Working for someone else means you’re a slave or always struggling:
The downplaying of lucrative salaried work is yet another example of ‘cope culture’, in which people have to reconcile their poor choices or having been dealt a bad hand at life by minimizing or downplaying the successful, or by inventing an alternate reality in which the successful are not actually successful or that rich people are not actually rich. Or that being financially successful entails some huge imagined tradeoff or Faustian bargain that makes the successful person resentful or otherwise tormented and regretting of his success.
Also, if you think working for a boss is stressful or has no work-life balance, entrepreneurship is is even more so. Each customer or client becomes your boss. What can go wrong? Everything.
It reminds me also of the people who expect to get rich with crypto having bought at the top (such as NFTs which have subsequently lost 90% or more of their value) and cannot bring themselves to accepting that they were mistaken or misled.
Same for the myth about broke doctors or how doctors do not make much money, such as on Reddit or below:
It's a bitter pill to swallow but if you want to get rich you're now forced to be a small business owner
Doctors, Lawyers and even majority of all bankers will never be rich after inflation and mediocre wage increases
Tough mental leap but have to start building equity ASAP
— BowTiedBull – Read Pinned Tweet or NGMI (@BowTiedBull) August 17, 2024
Specialists earn considerable money, even after accounting for student loan debt:
As for doctor salaries lagging inflation, that too is wrong:
As of 2024, typical medical school debt is $234,000 (depending on the source), which amounts to just $2,600/month for a 10-year loan at 6%. A salary of $300k/year, which is a conservative estimate, still leaves $160k-180k/year in discretionary income after factoring state and federal taxes and loan repayments. Yes, doctors have a late start due to credentialism, but rapidly earn it back; not to mention, there is a $67k/year stipend for residency, which alone is comparable to many jobs.
Also doctor careers are really long and relatively insulated from macro or firm-level factors (regardless of AI, people will always get sick), unlike other professions. Moreover, doctors can easily find work by being hired at hospitals instead of the long process of having to send out resumes. For this reason, physicians have the lowest unemployment rate of any profession:
Physicians have a low unemployment rate when compared to the national averageāaccording to the 100 Best Jobs list released by the U.S. News & World Report in 2024, the unemployment rate for physicians is 0.3%, which is less than the national unemployment rate of 3.7% in January 2024.Feb 22, 2024
The aforlinked Reddit post “Debunking Common Misconception: Doctors are Wealthy” was also debunked, with the top commenter responding with a similar calculation as mine:
By comparison, the “OP” was heavily downvoted for spreading misinformation.
The issue also is that people’s perception of wealth has been inflated or distorted by social media, in which unless you have a private plane, you are not ‘truly rich’ according to this contrived or unrealistic standard, but this leaves a lot of room in-between, in which you can still have a lot of money and a high standard of living despite not being a billionaire.
Same for the nonsense you see on social media about how Silicon Valley is unaffordable for tech employees. A $150-200k/year job (which is likely a conservative estimate for new hires) for a single person is more than enough even with student loans–just run the numbers and see your yourself.
As I show here, even under the most unfavorable of circumstances, you are still left with $70k/year of discretionary income after all expenses. This was in 2019, so salaries have gone up even more.
It helps greatly that income taxes in America are among the lowest of any developed country. The progressive tax structure means Americans who make as much as mid-six-figures have effective tax rates of only around 25-30% compared to 40-50% elsewhere. This holds even after factoring in state tax. The alleged superiority of ‘free’ healthcare elsewhere is negated by higher wages, lower taxes, and employer-sponsored healthcare for Americans.
Here is the after-tax breakdown for a $200k/year job in California, which includes state tax:
I am ignoring food, phone, car, rent and discretionary expenses, as these expenses tend to be constant or not mandatory. It’s not like only high earners need to commute to work, need shelter, healthcare, or phone plans, or have families, in which having more money can only help. And it’s not like these expenses scale with income, unlike taxes. There is a common misconception that rich people must spend more money, but unless they have large families or lifestyle creep, this is not necessarily true.
Thanks to low taxes and big salaries, this abundance of discretionary income can be invested in rapidly appreciating assets such as the S&P 500, the Nasdaq 100, or real estate to generate even more wealth. Assuming diligent investing, a continuation of the bull market, and keeping expenses low [0], being a millionaire is not out of the question. Sure, this is not Bill-Gates-level wealth, but it’s not bad either for a W-2. To say that this is not ‘sufficiently rich’ sounds like goalpost moving, or due to social media warping people’s perception of wealth, as discussed earlier.
As shown by the many posts on ‘FIRE’ or investing Reddit communities of salaried people making millions–it is indeed possible to get rich working for someone else. These are young and middle-aged people on Reddit who have homes, nest eggs, a good work-life balance, and a high standard of living despite working for someone else, yet are somehow ‘doing it wrong’ or are struggling or miserable according to the Twitter or hustle-culture narrative. Hell, even Steve Balmer became richer than Bill Gates despite working for him.
Of course, some doctors go into debt or go broke due to lifestyle creep, but this is true of all professions. It’s not like overspending is only limited to the wealthy or yuppies. The lottery is often likened to a tax on the poor or a regressive tax. Middle class families not uncommonly go into debt on such unnecessary or frivolous purchases as Taylor Swift tickets or Disney vacations. But anyone can choose to live within their means and save. Just saying ‘rich people go broke’ does not change the fact that overspending is choice. Warren Buffett has lived in the same home he bought in 1958; it’s not like he had to upgrade his lifestyle with his wealth.
Cope culture does not mean it is hopeless. Everyone is still endowed with free will (within certain biological constraints). You can stop gambling on crypto or sports. Or you can learn a skill that pays well, like coding. You can choose to invest and live within your means. Also, what is wrong with honesty. I think it’s better to just accept that, yes, doctors and techies earn a lot of money, instead of inventing copes and fictional narratives that they don’t. That seems like a better way to go through life.
[0] Yes, I am making assumptions here, such as the bull market continuing, but success at small business is also based on assumptions that are also out of one’s control, like customer demand and market trends. Or not having your business shut down due to a pandemic. By comparison, those with salaried work were allowed to work from home.