Tag Archives: feminism

Family and Individualism

From The Right Stuff: Equalism is Retarded

It’s time we rejected equalism and feminism. It’s time we rejected the notion that the desires of individual men and women are more important than the interests of the family as a social unit.

Hmmm….but why do these have to be mutually exclusive ? Why can’t we believe in HBD and individualism,as we as rejecting egalitarianism and feminism, in a society where the best and the brightest can live to their fullest potential? Social Darwinism, which is more relevant than ever in today’s competitive, increasingly automated economy, is a good sorting mechanism for separating the winners from the losers. Individualism, where each can compete to the best of his ability, is better than collectivism where wealth from the most the the productive is spread to the least.

Feminism would die in a free market society, as feminists and social justice warriors provide no economic value and are dependent on taxpayer dollars in the form of grants, tuition,and welfare for subsistence.

Families are important, but are also taxing, both financially and emotionally. All too many men are stuck in miserable relationships. Even if MGTOW becomes much more popular than it already is, there will still be enough reproduction to keep the population from falling below its replacement rate. The projections are that the world population will swell to 9-15 billion humans by 2100.

In any society, there is probably an optimal balance between individualism and collectivism. A society that is 100% atomized, by definition, is not a society. But history also shows that total conformity is no better. Those quirky people on the right side of the Bell Curve, with their idiosyncrasies, are needed for society to advance technologically, while everyone else goes about tending to civilization. If you go through Charles Murray’s database of human accomplishments, you’ll find virtually all accomplishments were made by smart people. Liberals value social justice and equality over quantifiable results. The left wants America to be a nation of takers, not creators.

Related: Individualism vs. Thede

PUA and NRx

The Necessary Divorce Between Traditionalists/Altright and the PUAs

PUAs are not truly against feminism at all. A PUA, which I will define as a man who wants to sleep with a lot of women, should be on his hands and knees praising feminism

To conclude, I believe they should break off from the alt-right and do what they do best, talk about how they all have banged 100 women and have 8 inch dicks.

These are the same generalizations used by the left against PUAs.

The PUAs are playing the game by the new rules, which are stacked against men. The PUAs know that the majority of women – due to feminist brainwashing and ‘changing societal values’ – are perfidious, superficial, materialistic, and uncommitted to long-term relationships, so they are turning the tables against these women by ‘picking them up’ using ‘Game’, the study of which allows men to use science-backed (whether or not it actually works is subject to debate) ‘methods’ to level the playing field. And many in the PUA community are also right about the destructiveness of feminism as it pertains to Western Civilization, a view also shared by NRx. To sever ties with the PUA community would be a gift to the left, who are strengthened by our weakness.

The Daily View: #pissforequality Hoax, Expatriated Cash, Unions Need More Money, Huge Web 2.0 Salaries

NSFW Feminists Fall For #PissForEquality Hoax

According to Right Wing News, a few n’er do wellers on 4chan had a brilliant idea: see if they could convince people to, “publicly piss/sh*t their pants in the name of ‘Equality?’”

Site likes 4chan are leading the post-2013 SJW backlash, with great success as thousands – maybe millions – of millennials retaliate against decades of leftist indoctrination.

Since he asked, maybe this guy:

Larry Summers is right:

And for feminist fat acceptance stupidity, Lane Bryant + McDonald’s, a perfect combination:

Big U.S. firms hold $2.1 trillion overseas to avoid taxes: study

…but not a peep by the left about trillions of dollars of wasteful spending under Obama, particularly the ineffective stimulus that cost about $830 billion – or about $275,000 per job created (sources give estimates as high as $4 million/job to as low as $200,000). Based on aforementioned evidence, I would say Apple and the rest of these ‘big firms’ are much better at managing their money than Obama (and the left) are at managing taxpayer money. If the left cared about optimizing money, they would they would go after wasteful entitlement spending programs. The left can’t hold themselves to the same impossibly high standards that they hold to corporations. I hope these corporations continue to give the ‘middle finger’ to the left by hording more money overseas.

The overpaid crybabies that brought the US auto industry to its knees in 2008 need more money.

Billion-dollar startups offering million-dollar paydays

Companies ranging from ride-hailing giant Uber to grocery delivery service Instacart to cybersecurity specialist Tanium are offering compensation packages to software experts in high-demand areas worth $1 million and up, recruiters and venture capitalists say. To reach $1 million, however, the packages count a few years of salary at $150,000 to $175,000 plus equity that vests over several years and may or may not ultimately be worth as much as it is today

But the left insists the economy is weak, capitalism is dead, IQ is not important, and America is not a meritocracy. This is not supposed to be happening. Aren’t those cheap Indian programmers supposed to be taking all the jobs? I guess you really do get what you pay for.